EDRM Metrics Project Print
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks

Metrics



EDRM Metrics Cube
The mission of the EDRM Metrics Project is to provide an effective means of measuring the time, money and volumes associated with e-discovery activities.

In addition, the Metrics model group is responsible for creating tracking, reporting and measurement protocols to assess e-discovery activities, and, to the extent metrics data becomes available, begin analysis of that data.

The Metrics project follows the e-discovery process described in the Electronic Discovery Reference Model: identification, preservation, collection, processing, review, analysis, and production, as well as the overarching project management activities that are in inherent part of any e-discovery undertaking.

EDRM Metrics Cube
EDRM Metrics Code Set
EDRM Metrics Case Study

Accomplishments

During the current project year the Metrics team has made great progress with several project deliverables. These elements of the project are designed to enable those involved in e-discovery activity to actively move forward with the process of effectively measuring and monitoring their projects. They include:

  • Metrics Cube Model – To help people develop a visual sense of how the metrics codes fit into the e-discovery process and how information may be measured, a 3-D model was developed that relates the metric types, aspects, and EDRM phases.
  • EDRM Metrics Code v. 1.0 – With e- discovery projects covering a wide variety and scope of information there are many different ways that activity can be measured. A code set was formulated with almost 1,500 measurement codes in a hierarchical structure to provide a basis to measure from an overview or granular level.
  • Metrics Glossary – With the wide variety of activities involved in the e-discovery process, this guide provides detailed descriptions of the codes used for measurement.
  • Metrics Tools – To further the capability to readily measure e-discovery activity, several dynamic spreadsheets have been developed to track and analyze Early Case Assessment (ECA), Review, and Collection activities by factors of volume, cost, and time.

Goals

As the project year continues, and further into the future, the Metrics group has more milestones and deliverables in its sights. Some ongoing goals are:

  • EDRM Metrics Guide – This is intended to aid those who want to track, analyze, and provide measurements relating to their e-discovery projects. It will serve as an introduction and provide best practices that cover several components of measurement, including:
    • Why measure?
    • What to measure?
    • How to measure and document?
    • Using metrics to improve your discovery process.
  • Metrics Problem Profiles – To provide tangible illustration of ways to measure and track activity in an e-discovery project, examples are being documented of select metrics challenges and goals throughout the EDRM phases using standardized problem scenarios. Having these reference materials should provide assistance setting best practices in a real life context.
  • Metrics Tools Development – The initial tools created by the Metrics team are a strong starting point to begin, or further, implementation of measurement and tracking programs. The group is working toward the availability of a standardized tool creation template based on the Metrics Codes that will enable users to make custom tracking tools.
  • ABA/LEDES Billing Codes – The LEDES Oversight Committee (“LOC”) Board has authorized the creation of a UTBMS Code Set for e-discovery as a formal project. This is intended exclusively for e-discovery purposes, separate from the recent Litigation Code Set revisions. Members of the Metrics project team will be participating in the ongoing revisions of these billing codes.
Downloads for the Metrics Project, sorted from newest to oldest:

  • Full Set of Materials from EDRM Lunch-and-Learn Session at LegalTech - March 1, 2010

    Here are links to all the materials used and distributed at the EDRM lunch-and-learn session at New York LegalTech

  • 2010-2011 EDRM Kickoff Meeting Update - February 26, 2010

    Whether you are a current EDRM participant, an EDRM alumnus, or have never participated in EDRM, we invite you to the kickoff meeting for the 2010-2011 EDRM year - our sixth year!

  • Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM) Announces Public Comment Period for All E-Discovery Projects - February 23, 2010

    ST. PAUL, Minn. – February 23, 2010 – The Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM) project teams announced today announced the beginning of the public comment period for new work product drafts posted on the EDRM website.

  • Overview Materials for EDRM Lunch-and-Learn Session - January 30, 2010

    Overview materials for the Feb. 1, 2010 EDRM lunch-and-learn session are now available for download

  • EDRM Metrics Overview and Case Study - January 28, 2010

    In preparation for the Feb. 1, 2010 EDRM lunch-and-learn session at LegalTech, we have posted two EDRM Metrics documents

  • EDRM Metrics Cube - January 28, 2010

    We have added a draft EDRM Metrics Cube to the EDRM Metrics page

  • EDRM at LegalTech - November 10, 2009

    EDRM will at LegalTech NY, with a Lunch & Learn session on Monday, February 1, 2010, in the Hilton's Petit Trianon room. Find out what we have been doing with EDRM, where we hope to go with the projects, and how you can get involved.

  • EDRM Approaches Mid-Year Meeting With New Website and Significant Project Advancements - October 17, 2009

    The Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM) project today announced that it is now easier for users to find the valuable research and standards created by the leading e-discovery industry group via a completely re-designed website, www.edrm.net. In addition, the EDRM leaders, Tom Gelbmann and George Socha, have provided updates to all of the working projects in advance of the mid-year meeting, which is being held from Oct. 20-21, 2009, in St. Paul, Minn.

  • What’s New at EDRM - September 11, 2009

    Great strides have been taken over the past two years to flesh out and further define the EDRM model. Over the next few months, you will be seeing two years worth of active collaboration, refinement and modeling being added to the EDRM website. As part of that process, we are re-building the site to provide users an updated interface with easier access to the valuable research and content. In that realm, we wanted to provide a quick update on what’s happening in each of the projects.

  • EDRM LegalTech Luncheon Presentation Now Available - February 9, 2009

    The presentation from the EDRM Luncheon at LegalTech New York is now available for download. On Feb. 3, 2009, EDRM leaders gave presentations on their working group activities and progress in 2008 as well as activities of focus in 2009. They covered all six EDRM projects: Evergreen, XML, Metrics, Search, Model Code of Conduct, and Data Set.

  • EDRM Luncheon at LegalTech New York Conference to Address Key E-Discovery Issues - January 29, 2009

    St. Paul, MN (January 28, 2009) – The Electronic Discovery Reference Model (“EDRM”), an industry group created to develop and establish practical guidelines and standards for electronic discovery, today announces: WHAT: An EDRM “Lunch and Learn” featuring George Socha, Tom Gelbmann and other industry leaders for a presentation on the key trends impacting e-discovery professionals, including advancing standards across all phases of the process (Evergreen), ethical challenges (Model Code of Conduct), search practices and technology advancements (Search), data challenges (Data Set) and XML integration between various e-discovery tools (XML). Attendees will also have an opportunity to learn more about involvement in this industry-leading organization.

  • Draft EDRM 2007-2008 Content Now Available for Public Comment - February 1, 2008

    The draft EDRM 2007-2008 content is now available for public comment.

  • EDRM Metrics Draft Documentation - March 16, 2007

Project Leaders | Organizations | Individuals

Project Leaders
Buckles, Gregory (Individual Participant)
Halprin, Jack (Autonomy)

Organizations (27)
Anacomp, Inc. http://www.anacomp.com
Autonomy http://www.autonomy.com
Chesapeake Energy Corporation http://www.chkenergy.com
Clearwell Systems http://www.clearwellsystems.com
CommVault http://www.commvault.com
CT Summation http://www.ctsummation.com
Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP http://www.deloitte.com
eDiscovery Management Associates http://www.ediscoverymanagement.com
EMC Corporation http://www.emc.com/solutions/compliance/ediscovery/index.jsp
Epiq Systems, Inc. http://www.epiqsystems.com
Faegre & Benson LLP http://www.faegre.com
Fios, Inc. http://www.fiosinc.com
FTI Consulting http://www.fticonsulting.com
GMAC ResCap http://www.gmacrescap.com
Guidance Software, Inc. http://www.guidancesoftware.com
IBM eDiscovery http://www.ibm.com/software/data/content-management/ediscovery.html
IDS Tech http://www.idstechinc.com/
KPMG LLP http://www.us.kpmg.com/fts
Littler Mendelson, PC http://www.littler.com
MindTree Ltd. http://www.mindtree.com
Navigant Consulting http://www.navigantconsulting.com
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP http://www.paulweiss.com
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pitmann LLP http://www.pillsburylaw.com
Planet Data Solutions, Inc. http://www.planetds.com
Ryley Carlock & Applewhite http://www.rcalaw.com
Symantec Corporation http://www.enterprisevault.com
TechLaw Solutions http://www.techlawsolutions.com

Top

Individuals (46)
Austin, Doug   Individual Participant
Buckles, Gregory   Individual Participant
Conner, Michael  Senior Manager, Forensic & Dispute Services Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP
DaRosa, Brian   Autonomy
DeLucia, Jennie   Individual Participant
Derk, Eric   Navigant Consulting
Doherty, Stephen  Principal eDiscovery Management Associates, LLC
Eschmann, Christopher  E-Discovery Project Manager Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton and Garrison LLP
Gianturco, Mark   IDS Tech
Gopalakrishnan, Saran   Anacomp, Inc.
Halprin, Jack   Autonomy
Haslam, Hope  Director of Channel Management Epiq Systems Inc.
Hazard, Ellen   Individual Participant
Hutchinson, Rick   Anacomp, Inc.
Kaul, Vikram   Mindtree Ltd.
Kendrick, Kris  Systems Engineer – IT Litigation Support Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Koch, Ken   KPMG LLP
Lappin, Michael  Principal Systems Engineer Symantec Corporation
Lawn, Greg  Attenex Professional Services FTI Consulting
Levirne, Jake  Senior Product Manager IBM eDiscovery
Maheu, Karen   Individual Participant
Mallen, Carrie  Director, National Accounts Document Technologies, Inc.
McCarthy, Justin  Manager, Analytic and Forensic Technology Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP
McGuire, Michael  Attorney Littler Mendelson, PC
McLaughlin, Don  President/CEO Falcon Discovery
McManus, William   Ryley, Carlock & Applewhite
Melby, Jenifer  Document Analyst – Client Technology Services Faegre & Benson LLP
Miller, Danae   Individual Participant
O’Connor, Kevin  Director of Product Management, EMC Archiving Prod EMC Corporation
Petty, Jim   PSS Systems
Phelan, Michael   Navigant Consulting
Rangan, Venkat  CTO Clearwell Systems
Rey, Jorge   Individual Participant
Ronk, Matt   Navigant Consulting
Rowley, John   IDS Tech
Ruckman, Andy  Principal, Forensic & Dispute Services Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP
Rutledge, John  Director of Quality Services Fios, Inc.
Sonbolian, Jay  Senior Manager Forensic & Dispute Resolution Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP
Stanton, David  Partner Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Stewart, Jon  Manager, EnScript Services Guidance Software, Inc.
Stromberg, Jay   Techlaw Solutions
Sutterfield, Logan  Principal Solutions Engineer, eDiscovery Symantec Corporation
Wade, Michael   Planet Data Solutions, Inc.
Walsh, Patrick   GMAC ResCap
Webb Johnson, Lisa  Supervisor – IT Compliance Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Zezula, Ronnda   Individual Participant

Top

Leave a comment

Go to top

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>