By Doug Austin
\r\n
In Prezio Health, Inc. v. Schenk, et. al., No. 13-1463 (D. Conn., Sept. 9, 2015), after “a careful in camera review” of emails responsive to eighteen keyword search terms, Connecticut Magistrate Judge Joan Glazer Margolis ordered the defendant to produce metadata for eight specific emails which had already been produced to the plaintiff.
\r\n
Case Background
\r\n
In this dispute over a non-compete provision, the plaintiff provided a list of 18 search terms to be used in searching the defendants’…
