By Doug Austin
\r\n
In AVM Technologies, LLC v. Intel Corp., No. 15-00033 (D. Delaware, May 3, 2016), Delaware Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge granted in part the plaintiff’s request for the defendant to perform a database search of four terms and their synonyms, but limited the scope of that search to one specific defendant database, not the variety of sources requested by the plaintiff to be searched.
\r\n
Case Background
\r\n
In this patent infringement case where the plaintiff sued the defendant in connection with…
Related Stories
- Court Rules Lack of Bad Faith in Denying Sanctions for Defendants’ Deletion of ESI: eDiscovery Case Law
- Merely Stating That ESI Request Is Not Relevant Or Proportional Is Not Sufficient, Court Rules: eDiscovery Case Law
- Citing Proportionality Concerns, Court Grants Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order: eDiscovery Case Law
