By Doug Austin
Remember earlier this week, when we once again discussed the perils of not checking your wildcard terms before agreeing to them? This case law summary is a prime example of that. Perhaps more narrowed search terms would have reduced the review required. Frankly, I’m surprised more documents weren’t retrieved.
\r\n
In Bancpass, Inc. v. Highway Toll Administration, LLC, No. A-14-CV-1062-SS (W.D. Tex. July 26, 2016), Texas Magistrate Judge Andrew W. Austin (no relation) denied the…
Related Stories
- Court Rejects Discovery for Additional Time Period, But Grants Additional Discovery on Termination Plan: eDiscovery Case Law
- Defendant Receives Terminating Sanctions and More for “Persistent Contemptuous Behavior”: eDiscovery Case Law
- Sometimes, Your Wildcard May Not Be “Wild” Enough: eDiscovery Best Practices
