By Doug Austin
In Portland Pipe Line Corp. et. al. v. City of South Portland et. al., No. 15-00054 (D. Maine, Sept. 8, 2016), Maine Magistrate Judge John H. Rich, III denied the defendants’ motion to compel the production of documents withheld or redacted on claims of attorney-client privilege by the plaintiff, finding that the plaintiffs “undertook a costly and labor-intensive two-step process with respect to claiming privilege as to ESI, first relying on a technologically-assisted privilege review…
Related Stories
- If Plaintiff Wants Discovery on Defendant’s Backup Tapes, Court Rules He Must Pay for Them: eDiscovery Case Law
- Appeals Court Upholds Default Judgment for Discovery Violations, Including Wiping Files from Laptop: eDiscovery Case Law
- Defendant Not Required to Produce All Documents Responsive to Search Terms: eDiscovery Case Law
