Tired of stories about COVID-19? So are we. So, here’s an interesting case to take a look at instead. :o)
In U.S. v. Morgan, No. 1:18-CR-00108 EAW (W.D.N.Y. March 6, 2020), New York District Judge Elizabeth A. Wolford denied the defendant’s Motion for Return of Property Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g), ruling that “[t]he government’s evidentiary interest in the [defendant’s] iPhone outweighs Defendant’s interest in its return, at least at this stage of the…
Related Stories
- Court Observes “Timing is Everything” in Determining When Litigation is Anticipated: eDiscovery Case Law
- Court Denies Plaintiff’s Sanctions Request, Points Out Her Own “Misconduct”: eDiscovery Case Law
- Here’s a Webcast to How to Win the Battle on Discovery Form of Production: eDiscovery Webcasts