By Doug Austin
\r\n
In Sunderland v. Suffolk County et. al., No. 13-4838 (E.D.N.Y., June 14, 2016), New York Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson, determining that the plaintiff’s request for individual defendants to search for and produce certain documents from their personal computers and email accounts was not “unduly intrusive or burdensome” because the request was limited in time frame and the parties had agreed to search terms, granted the plaintiff’s motion to compel.
\r\n
Case Background
\r\n
In this case…
Related Stories
- Court Rejects Plaintiff’s Request for Fee Reimbursement in Responding to Motion: eDiscovery Case Law
- Court Settles Dispute Between Parties on Number of Custodians to Search and Produce: eDiscovery Case Law
- Court Determines Granting Defendant’s Motion to Request Overseas Documents is ‘Futile’: eDiscovery Case Law
