Uncategorized
← Back to Blog
Search
Authors
WHY I Do What I Do: eDiscovery Reflections
It’s a rare two post day for us here at eDiscovery Daily. To check out the other post today, click here. One of the things I like most about working at CloudNine is the company...
Missed the eDiscovery Business Confidence Webinar? Here is Where You Can Still Check it Out: eDiscovery Trends
It’s a rare two post day for us here at eDiscovery Daily. To check out the other post today, click here. On Wednesday, ACEDS hosted a webinar (sponsored by CloudNine) where we discussed results from...
Was Spoliation Intentional? Court Will Let Jury Decide: eDiscovery Case Law
In Cahill v. Dart, No. 13-cv-361 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 2, 2016), Illinois District Judge John Z. Lee adopted, with modifications, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Cox regarding the plaintiff’s motion to sanction the...
LegalTimes Readers Vote CloudNine as a Leading eDiscovery Provider
Survey of Legal Professionals Ranks CloudNine as Second Leading End-to-End eDiscovery Provider CloudNine, the eDiscovery Company (eDiscovery.co) that empowers legal and business professionals with eDiscovery automation software and professional services that simplify litigation, investigations, and...
Today’s the Day to Hear Experts Comment on the State of eDiscovery Business Confidence: eDiscovery Trends
Last week, we covered results from the ACEDS and Complex Discovery Fall 2016 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey, which was conducted last month with the results published on Rob Robinson’s terrific Complex Discovery site. There’s even...
Defendant Sanctioned for Spoliation of Physical Evidence, But Not ESI: eDiscovery Case Law
In Reed v. Kindercare Learning Centers et. al., No. 15-5634 (W.D. Wash., Nov. 17, 2016), Washington District Judge Benjamin H. Settle (yes, that’s his real name!) granted the plaintiff’s motion for discovery sanctions with respect...
The Importance of Early Data Assessment: eDiscovery Best Practices
Why do we have a picture of Santa Claus for an eDiscovery blog post about early data assessment? Read on. In the Fall 2016 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey conducted last month, over a third of...
Court Orders Defendant to Produce Additional ESI Responsive to 78 “Unopposed” Search Terms: eDiscovery Case Law
In Venturdyne, Ltd. d/b/a Scientific Dust Collectors v. Carbonyx, Inc., d/b/a Carbonyx Carbon Technologies, et. al., No. 14-00351 (N.D. Ind., Nov. 15, 2016), Indiana District Judge John E. Martin ordered the defendant to produce additional...
Supreme Court Gives Samsung an Early Christmas Present – For Now: eDiscovery Case Law
We almost made it the entire year without an update on the ubiquitous Apple v. Samsung case. Thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court, this long lasting case isn’t done yet. As reported earlier this week...
Finding Categorical Privilege Log to Be Inadequate, Court Orders Plaintiff to Provide a Metadata Log: eDiscovery Case Law
In Companion Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. U.S. Bank N.A., No. 15-01300 (D. S.C., Nov. 3, 2016), South Carolina District Judge J. Michelle Childs determined that the plaintiff’s categorical Privilege Log was inadequate and...
It May Be FALL, But eDiscovery Business Confidence Is On The RISE: eDiscovery Trends
The results are in from the ACEDS and Complex Discovery Fall 2016 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey, which was conducted last month and (as was the case for the Winter, Spring and Summer surveys) the results...
Evolution of eDiscovery Automation – Looking Back and Looking Forward: eDiscovery Trends
How has eDiscovery automation technology evolved over the years? Where is it headed? What is the current state of acceptance for Technology Assisted Review (TAR) within courts and within the bar? How do the different...