
The Standard for In Camera Review of Assertedly Privileged Documents
In Willoughby v. Govt’. Employees Insurance Co., 2024 WL 3183860 (M.D. Fl. June 26, 2024), the court explained the standard governing requests for in camera review.
While there were several motions and cross-motions, on the in camera review issue, the court wrote that: “Plaintiff attached almost 200 pages of Defendant’s privilege logs, highlighted to reflect the hundreds of entries that Plaintiff wished the Court to review.”
The court held that plaintiff failed to demonstrate a sufficient basis to invoke that process. Plaintiff’s argument was that “it appears that Defendant is asserting privilege over documents in which counsel gave business advice rather than legal advice.”









