Rules
← Back to Blog
There is Difference Between a Discovery-Based Daubert Exclusionary Ruling and a Discovery Sanction
In the recent case of Asokere v. Waldrop, the Appeals Court closely examined the effects of changing sworn expert testimony between deposition and Daubert hearings. This examination revealed essential differences between Daubert exclusionary rulings and...
There’s No Right or Wrong Answer – But There Are Mistakes
In Rayome v. ABT Electronics, 2024 WL 1435098 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 3, 2024), the court wrote that “it would be in the parties’ interest to reach a negotiated result. It should not be forgotten that a...
April’s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery
Gain insights on e-discovery with an analysis of U.S. court rulings on spoliation sanctions and electronic data management. This month’s notable cases cover reasonably useful forms of production and when intent can be inferred from...
Sometimes Discovery Disputes Do Not Bring Out the Best in Us.
In the recent decision in M1 Holdings, Inc. v. Members 1st Fed. Credit Union, 2024 WL 182220 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 17, 2024), interesting, both of the disputing litigants were ordered to state under oath that they...
Changing the Forum for a Motion to Quash a Subpoena
Learn how a federal district court changed the forum for a motion to quash a subpoena from the district where compliance is required to the district where the action is pending.
March’s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery
Recent e-Discovery Court Rulings You Should Know written by Sidley Austin’s Tom Paskowitz each month. Get the latest on crucial e-discovery decisions. This Sidley Update covers form or forms of production, deposition testimony, clawback rulings...