AI Ethics
← Back to Blog
Search
Authors
![[Podcast] HaystackID® in the EDRM Illumination Zone: Erin Meyer, Mary Bennett, Jason Cassel, and Alex Lewandowski](https://edrm.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/HaystackID-Blog-Podcast-HaystackID®-in-the-EDRM-Illumination-Zone-Erin-Meyer-Mary-Bennett-Jason-Cassel-and-Alex-Lewandowski.png)
[Podcast] HaystackID® in the EDRM Illumination Zone: Erin Meyer, Mary Bennett, Jason Cassel, and Alex Lewandowski
HaystackID’s marketing team explains how it combines multiple AI models, reusable frameworks, continuous quality control, and human review to create content faster without sacrificing accuracy, brand consistency, or accountability.
“Court Sanction for Plaintiff’s Use of Prompt-Injection”
A Connecticut court sanctioned a self-represented litigant for repeatedly concealing AI prompt-injection instructions in court filings. In Elliott v. New York Bariatric Group, LLC, the court distinguished the familiar risk of unreliable AI output from...
When AI Agents Go Rogue, the Logs Become Evidence
Ralph Losey does a deep dive on the OpenAI-Hugging Face sandbox escape including new agentic capabilities to evade constraints, and share exploits at massively parallel scale. Losey also looks at what will become evidence.
Cite Checking to Find Hallucinated Cases Deemed Insufficient – Part II – Verification and Candor Are Expected
Recent federal decisions emphasize that automated cite checking is not enough when AI touches legal filings. Courts expect attorneys to personally verify authorities, quotations, and cited cases, and to act candidly and promptly when errors...
Passing the Controls: The Art of Legal Judgment, Mentorship, and the Next Generation in the Age of AI
What happens to legal judgment when AI can perform, at surface level, the very tasks junior lawyers have always used to build skill? Retired judge Ralph Artigliere and Wake Forest-bound Zara Russell tackle that question...
Another A.I. Protective Order
Protective orders addressing the use of A.I. to review materials produced to an opponent in discovery are becoming routine. The stipulated protective order in RMME LLC v. Majestic Steel USA, Inc., 2026 WL 1831063, at...
Is it OK if “Actual Authorities” Support the “Bogus” Proposition Set Out in a Hallucinated Case?
In Withers v. City of Aberdeen, a federal court rejected the argument that attorneys should avoid sanctions for citing AI-hallucinated cases simply because legitimate authorities support the same legal propositions. The decision emphasizes that fake...
Trial Court’s Order Contained Hallucinated Mistake
The Georgia Court of Appeals rebuked both counsel and the trial court after a proposed order containing a hallucinated case citation was submitted and signed. In Henry County Schools v. Grant, the court highlighted errors...
Webinar Transcript | Training Is Not Enough: Guardrails for Responsible AI Use in Legal Practice
Legal professionals are not short on AI training, they are short on what comes next. In this EDRM webinar, Judge Ralph Artigliere, Professor William Hamilton, Suzanne Clark, Rose Hunter Jones, and Dr. Varun Chadalavada examine...
Five great reads on cyber, data, and legal discovery for May 2026
This edition of Five Great Reads examines deepfake-driven evidentiary challenges, accelerating synthetic-content regulations, AI-powered antitrust enforcement, legal AI platform disruption, and major EU AI Act developments shaping compliance, privacy, cybersecurity, and eDiscovery.
Deepfake Photos Admitted – Proponent Held in Contempt – 45-Day Incarceration
In an unpublished opinion, the Kentucky Court of Appeals let stand a finding of contempt with a 45 day incarceration for a photo submitted to prove a health care incident during a divorce proceeding. Opinions...
Ireland’s AI regulator role gets a hard look at Dublin Tech Summit
AI, privacy and policy leaders at Dublin Tech Summit examined Ireland’s emerging role as a global AI regulator, the EU AI Act delays, GDPR’s dominance in AI governance, and the growing compliance pressures facing cybersecurity,...