
AI Ethics
← Back to Blog
Search
Authors
Passing the Controls: The Art of Legal Judgment, Mentorship, and the Next Generation in the Age of AI
What happens to legal judgment when AI can perform, at surface level, the very tasks junior lawyers have always used to build skill? Retired judge Ralph Artigliere and Wake Forest-bound Zara Russell tackle that question...
Another A.I. Protective Order
Protective orders addressing the use of A.I. to review materials produced to an opponent in discovery are becoming routine. The stipulated protective order in RMME LLC v. Majestic Steel USA, Inc., 2026 WL 1831063, at...
Is it OK if “Actual Authorities” Support the “Bogus” Proposition Set Out in a Hallucinated Case?
In Withers v. City of Aberdeen, a federal court rejected the argument that attorneys should avoid sanctions for citing AI-hallucinated cases simply because legitimate authorities support the same legal propositions. The decision emphasizes that fake...
Trial Court’s Order Contained Hallucinated Mistake
The Georgia Court of Appeals rebuked both counsel and the trial court after a proposed order containing a hallucinated case citation was submitted and signed. In Henry County Schools v. Grant, the court highlighted errors...
Webinar Transcript | Training Is Not Enough: Guardrails for Responsible AI Use in Legal Practice
Legal professionals are not short on AI training, they are short on what comes next. In this EDRM webinar, Judge Ralph Artigliere, Professor William Hamilton, Suzanne Clark, Rose Hunter Jones, and Dr. Varun Chadalavada examine...
Five great reads on cyber, data, and legal discovery for May 2026
This edition of Five Great Reads examines deepfake-driven evidentiary challenges, accelerating synthetic-content regulations, AI-powered antitrust enforcement, legal AI platform disruption, and major EU AI Act developments shaping compliance, privacy, cybersecurity, and eDiscovery.
Deepfake Photos Admitted – Proponent Held in Contempt – 45-Day Incarceration
In an unpublished opinion, the Kentucky Court of Appeals let stand a finding of contempt with a 45 day incarceration for a photo submitted to prove a health care incident during a divorce proceeding. Opinions...
Ireland’s AI regulator role gets a hard look at Dublin Tech Summit
AI, privacy and policy leaders at Dublin Tech Summit examined Ireland’s emerging role as a global AI regulator, the EU AI Act delays, GDPR’s dominance in AI governance, and the growing compliance pressures facing cybersecurity,...
Using AI for Legal Tasks: When Delegation Becomes a Dirty Word
Judge Ralph Artigliere explores the growing tension between AI assistance and professional responsibility in legal practice. This article examines over-delegation risks, automation bias, eDiscovery implications, and the need for real-time human oversight in AI-assisted legal...
Supervisory Duties vis-à-vis “Hallucinated” Citations
A California federal court sanctioned a supervising partner for AI-hallucinated citations his associate filed, holding that a firm’s silence on citation-checking policy implicates the whole institution.
The Goblin in the Machine: What OpenAI’s “No-Pigeon Rule” Teaches Lawyers About AI Hallucinations
OpenAI’s “goblin incident” exposes how training incentives can produce persistent, unintended AI behavior across LLMs. The same root causes drive hallucination, and legal professionals need concrete verification steps before relying on AI output in legal...
From Training to Execution: Embedded Safeguards for Responsible AI Use in Legal Practice
AI is already transforming legal practice, but training alone isn’t enough. This article explores how embedded safeguards—built directly into workflows—help lawyers and judges apply their knowledge reliably under pressure, reducing risk and reinforcing professional responsibility...
