
Topic
← Back to Blog
Search
Authors
California’s AI Transparency Act arrives alongside Europe’s Article 50
On August 2, 2026, California’s AI Transparency Act became operative, the same day most EU AI Act Article 50 transparency duties began applying. Covered providers now owe a detection tool, embedded latent disclosures, and a...
A Practitioner’s Perspective: e-Discovery Lessons from the Public Sector
Sean Zacharias, a 20-year veteran of the Department of Justice, argues that government e-discovery operates under distinct defensibility, budget, and security constraints that shape how AI-assisted review should be adopted. They describe the matter that...
Discovery Is Quietly Reorganizing Itself Around AI
A panel of eDiscovery and legal-tech leaders from HaystackID’s most recent webcast reports that AI-assisted review has moved from experimentation to default practice far faster than technology-assisted review did a decade ago, reshaping early case...
Illumination Zone: Episode 239 | Erin Meyer, Mary Bennett, Jason Cassel, and Alex Lewandowski of HaystackID sit down with Mary Mack and Holley Robinson
In this episode, the team returns to the Illumination Zone to share how their AI tools and workflows have evolved. They walk through their three-part design specification for working across Claude, ChatGPT, and other LLMs;...
Condominium Construction Defect Litigation Leads to Search and Custodian Rulings
Michael D. Berman examines a Vermont federal court’s order requiring a condominium association to disclose its keyword search methodology in detail, while rejecting a developer’s bid to force ESI collection from every current and former...
Open weights, open questions: the letter that redrew the AI policy fight
Seventy-seven companies and organizations, including Nvidia, Microsoft, and Meta, urged Washington to avoid premature restrictions on open-weight AI models amid allegations involving Moonshot AI, an OpenAI model-testing breach affecting Hugging Face, and EU AI Act...
An Attorney-Client Communication Advising Spoliation is Not Privileged
Michael D. Berman examines a ruling that advice to spoliate evidence is not privileged, though the court found no actual destruction because both pre- and post-advice versions of Meta’s disputed documents survived and were ordered...
“Ten depositions are too few for this case…. But twenty-seven depositions is too many….”
A federal court in a LinkedIn subscriber class action alleging monopolization split the difference between the parties’ deposition requests, holding that being a document custodian isn’t enough on its own to justify a deposition.
Why Private Copies Are the Next Privacy Risk Frontier
Sheila Grela examines how unofficial, duplicative private copies saved on laptops, in email threads, and across collaboration platforms create privacy, discovery, and breach exposure that formal governance systems fail to track, drawing on the updated...
Two Debatable Holdings
Michael D. Berman examines a S.D.N.Y. discovery order requiring production of every document that hits an agreed search term, without a responsiveness review, and questions whether the ruling reaches beyond the scope allowed under Rule...
Drafting RFPs for Robots to Read
With producing parties increasingly letting large language models make first-pass relevance calls, this piece argues that requests for production should be drafted as prompts and demonstrates this approach using the Dominion Voting Systems v. Fox...
An ESI Protocol Does Not [Necessarily?] Supersede the Discovery Rules
A federal court held that an ESI Protocol implements the Federal Rules rather than replacing them, rejecting a defendant’s argument that it could skip a plainly relevant custodian simply because he wasn’t named in the...
