District of Nevada’s Opportunity for Junior Lawyers to Argue Motions

District of Nevada’s Opportunity for Junior Lawyers to Argue Motions by Michael D. Berman, E-Discovery LLC.
Image: Holley Robinson, EDRM.

[EDRM Editor’s Note: The opinions and positions are those of the author.]


Like most, if not all, federal courts, the District of Nevada has a local rule that permits it to consider motions with or without a hearing. However, there is a novel twist in one Judge’s Standing Order:

Judge Baldwin encourages litigants to permit more junior members of the litigation team to present oral argument and gain courtroom experience. Thus, as a supplement to the rule requesting oral argument, a party should note in the filing that the requested argument or hearing would be handled by a more junior lawyer. In those instances where Judge Baldwin may be inclined to rule on the papers, a representation that a younger lawyer would be responsible for presenting argument will weigh in favor of holding a hearing.

Robertson v. Formation Nation, Inc., 2026 WL 1134153 (D. Nev. Apr. 27, 2026)(Baldwin, J.)(emphasis added).

That is a really wonderful concept.


Assisted by GAI and LLM Technologies per EDRM’s GAI and LLM Policy.

Author

  • Michael Berman

    Michael Berman is a practicing lawyer and an adjunct faculty member at the University of Baltimore School of Law.  He has published extensively, including as the editor-in-chief and a contributing author in “Electronically Stored Information in Maryland Courts” (Maryland State Bar Ass’n. 2020), co-editing two American Bar Association books on electronic discovery, as well as co-authoring law review and other articles regarding electronically stored information (“ESI”).  He has presented widely in venues ranging from local to National events and served as a Court Appointed ESI Discovery Supervisor for ESI Protocol.

    View all posts Owner, E-Discovery LLC