Tag spoliation sanctions

It May Be an Abuse of Discretion to Grant Summary Judgment for a Defendant Before Deciding a Plaintiff’s Sanctions Motion, by Michael D. Berman, E-Discovery LLC.

It May Be an Abuse of Discretion to Grant Summary Judgment for a Defendant Before Deciding a Plaintiff’s Sanctions Motion

Michael D. Berman examines Smith v. Polk Co., where the court addressed two spoliation sanctions motions before granting summary judgment. Applying Shaw v. Foreman, the court recognized that a sanctions motion involving evidence significant to the merits may need to be resolved before summary judgment.

Read MoreIt May Be an Abuse of Discretion to Grant Summary Judgment for a Defendant Before Deciding a Plaintiff’s Sanctions Motion
EEOC v. Mia Aesthetics Clinic ATL, LLC – Round III by Michael D. Berman, E-Discovery LLC.

EEOC v. Mia Aesthetics Clinic ATL, LLC – Round III

In EEOC v. Mia Aesthetics Clinic ATL, LLC – Round III, the court rejected reliance on routine document destruction policies as a shield against spoliation sanctions and held that deposition testimony is not an adequate substitute for missing contemporaneous ESI. The decision offers important guidance on preservation duties, Rule 37(e), secondary evidence, and the continuing demise of the old “safe harbor” defense.

Read MoreEEOC v. Mia Aesthetics Clinic ATL, LLC – Round III
Cellebrite Enterprise Solutions - From Texts to Trials: The Impact of Mobile Data on eDiscovery Today

From Texts to Trials: The Impact of Mobile Data on eDiscovery Today

Mobile data is increasingly central to modern eDiscovery, with courts confronting complex issues of privacy, preservation, and proportionality. This article explores landmark cases and recent rulings that demonstrate the evidentiary power and legal implications of smartphone data.

Read MoreFrom Texts to Trials: The Impact of Mobile Data on eDiscovery Today