Case
← Back to Blog
Search
Authors
Restrictions on Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools to Process Disclosure Materials
Michael Berman reports on a case with restrictions on the use of AI tools to handle disclosure materials and questions what happens in a clawback situation.
Does Microsoft Teams Require Different Search Terms Than Email?
In Kim v. Cushman & Wakefield, a Central District of California court found that keyword searches adequate for email may be insufficient for Microsoft Teams, where messages are shorter, more informal, and less likely to...
A.I. Protective Order—Again
Two recent Southern District of New York cases highlight a growing trend in discovery practice: protective orders that regulate how parties may use confidential discovery materials with AI tools. While not universal, these provisions increasingly...
If “Junk” is Responsive to Your Request, You Can’t Complaint About Getting “Junk”
In Alex v. City of Ann Arbor, the court rejected objections to PDF productions and alleged “junk” documents, holding that broad discovery requests often produce broad results.
EEOC v. Mia Aesthetics Clinic ATL, LLC – Round III
In EEOC v. Mia Aesthetics Clinic ATL, LLC – Round III, the court rejected reliance on routine document destruction policies as a shield against spoliation sanctions and held that deposition testimony is not an adequate...
EEOC’s Tenacious Pursuit of Discovery Bore Fruit
In EEOC v. GEM Management, LLC, the EEOC’s persistent pursuit of discovery led to a substantially granted motion to compel. The court criticized GEM’s ESI search methodology, custodial self-collection, form of production, Bates numbering, and...
Request for Expedited Discovery Granted; Motion to Stay Discovery Denied
A federal court in Ohio granted a plaintiff’s request for expedited discovery tied to a preliminary injunction motion while denying the defendants’ attempt to stay discovery pending resolution of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss.
Motion for Reconsideration—It Does Not Exist—But It Is Routinely Entertained—On Limited Grounds
A Colorado federal court denied reconsideration in Stanisaveljevic v. The Standard Fire Ins. Co., finding that evidence already in a party’s possession but left unreviewed is not newly discovered. The opinion reinforces that discovery choices...
Motion to Compel Forensic Image of Cell Phone: Granted in Part; Denied in Part
Michael Berman analyzes Madrigal v. Live Nation, where a court granted in part Ticketmaster’s motion to compel a forensic image of the class representative’s cell phone. The decision offers practitioners a clear roadmap on Rule...
Incomplete ESI Protocol Negotiations Do Not Justify Delay in Production
In a recent case, the defendants opposed certain discovery. The court wrote: “Defendants also note that ‘the parties are still negotiating their joint agreement for ESI protocols’ and assert that he parties should not simultaneously be in...
Request for Broad “Apex” Executive Discovery Replaced by Phased Discovery Order
A federal court rejects broad apex executive discovery requests, instead ordering phased ESI production that balances proportionality, cost, and relevance under Rule 26.
Inadvertent Production of Work Product Did Not Waive Protection; However, Recipient Showed Substantial Need and Overcame That Protection
In Aerosonic LLC v. Joby Aero, Inc., the court held that inadvertent disclosure of work product did not waive protection under Rule 502 and the ESI Protocol. However, the receiving party demonstrated substantial need and...