Michael D. Berman examines Bradwell v. Hochul, where a federal court rejected a self-represented litigant’s constitutional challenge involving New York’s AI rules for court filings.
A Connecticut court sanctioned a self-represented litigant for repeatedly concealing AI prompt-injection instructions in court filings. In Elliott v. New York Bariatric Group, LLC, the court distinguished the familiar risk of unreliable AI output from the deliberate manipulation of AI input and concluded that hidden instructions intended to influence automated review constituted a serious litigation abuse.