Author: Hon. Ralph Artigliere (ret.)
← Back to Blog
Search
Authors
Reasonable or Overreach? Rethinking Sanctions for AI Hallucinations in Legal Filings
When AI-generated hallucinations appear in court filings, how should judges respond? A new four-pillar framework proposes principled, proportional sanctions to protect the justice system without overreach.
When AI Policies Fail: The AI Sanctions in Johnson v. Dunn and What They Mean for the Profession
The Johnson v. Dunn case marks a turning point in judicial tolerance for AI citation errors. Despite clear firm policies and experienced counsel, the court imposed severe sanctions, signaling that only individual verification, not institutional...
The $20 Test: What a Parking Lot Taught Me About AI and Legal Judgment
When a young lawyer found a $20 bill, he faced a simple yet profound ethical choice. Decades later, Hon. Judge Ralph Artigliere (ret) compares his human decision to AI’s analysis, revealing why empathy, intuition, and...
Avoiding the Third Rail of Legal AI: Don’t Let the Machine Think for You
As AI becomes more powerful, legal professionals face growing pressure to rely on it for core tasks. But true responsibility means using these tools wisely, without surrendering judgment, accountability, or the human craft of legal...
The Future Is Now: Why Trial Lawyers and Judges Should Embrace Generative AI Now and How to Do it Safely and Productively
This article offers a clear framework for trial lawyers and judges to adopt generative AI responsibly, emphasizing practical use cases, ethical safeguards, and the importance of human oversight in legal decision-making.
Hope for the Future: How Students Are Defining the Best Use of AI
Younger generations are showing a remarkable ability to navigate AI’s ethical challenges, often surpassing legal professionals in responsible use. By integrating AI literacy into education and legal training, we can ensure AI serves as a...
Modernizing Florida Litigation: The 2025 Civil Procedure Rule Overhaul
Florida’s 2025 civil procedure rule amendments introduce mandatory case management, proportionality in discovery, and initial disclosure requirements. These reforms, modeled after federal standards, aim to streamline litigation, reduce delays, and enhance judicial efficiency. Practitioners must...
AI Hallucinations in Court: A Wake-Up Call for the Legal Profession
Despite judicial warnings, attorneys continue to submit AI-generated court documents with fabricated citations. This article explores key cases, ethical obligations, and best practices for responsible AI use in legal practice.
Keeping the Temperature Just Right for Effective eDiscovery Negotiations
Effective eDiscovery negotiation is essential for modern legal practice, fostering cooperation, reducing costs, and achieving better outcomes.
Pioneering Dispute Resolution: The New JAMS AI Rules
Leslie O’Neal and Hon. Ralph Artigliere (Ret.) delve into the JAMS AI Rules, effective June 14, 2024, prioritizing confidentiality, expert-led processes, and expedited discovery to resolve complex AI disputes fairly and efficiently.
Legal Professionals Should Embrace Generative AI Now and Join a New Era of Co-Intelligence
This article explores how generative AI is transforming legal workflows and decision-making. Legal professionals who embrace AI now will enhance their efficiency, mitigate risks, and maintain a crucial edge in a rapidly evolving legal landscape.
Florida Takes a Measured Approach to Ethical Guardrails on Generative AI
Generative AI is transforming legal practice and raising complex ethical issues. On August 29, 2024, the Florida Supreme Court amended the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar to address these concerns, marking a forward-thinking approach to...